data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
Years ago I was exposed to Jerry Mander's
Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television [
3 ]
-- a penetrating set of polemics that outlines, from several vantage points, the
dangers of television-watching and how the very medium itself is destructive and non-reformable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
Many unfamiliar with the work will laugh
at the very notion . . . and I might well laugh, as well -- were it not for the fact
that in the 30+ years since Mander penned his book, I have been able to observe
the predictable outcome of avoiding the subject, which has become only more pronounced
. . . and horrifying.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
This month I focus on just
one of
Mander's arguments -- the first, in fact, of his book, as it would apply to medicine.
Mander called it "The Mediation of Experience." [
4 ]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
As I detail extensively in
Meditopia,
one of the unspoken, rarely considered assumptions of
modern medicine
is that progress is made through the march of technology. The idea that technology
is the cure for our problems is ubiquitous in modern life. If my cellphone breaks,
I take it to a phone technician. If my car breaks down; a mechanic.
For my Mac; a computer tech. For my refrigerator; a "frig" guy.
If I lose internet, I summon the cable guy. If I lose power, my provider
sends an electrician . . .
And what do I do if I get sick?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
Well, that's easy. I just go to a
medical technician . . .
a medical doctor or similar practitioner, depending on my problem . . . someone who has a
technical solution, a scientific answer, someone in touch with the latest
discoveries in
that field. Makes sense, doesn't it?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
Sure, it makes sense . . . but that's only because we live
in a mediated environment that shields us from the obvious . . .
WE may live in world surrounding
by technical man-made artifacts, but our bodies are not born of technology. They're born of nature.
Only by living in a world that is so completely out of touch with nature could we be blinded
to this self-evident fact.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
The very foundation of modern pharmacology is based
on a single principle that is as far removed from nature as one can imagine. It takes as
Gospel that the healing arts can only find perfection through the search for discrete,
chemical, molecular entities -- the vast majority of which cannot be found to exist
within Nature herself. Moreover, these chemical entities must be unique and patentable . . .
and they can only be discovered and sold by companies with sufficient capital (i.e. in
the hundreds of millions of dollars per entity) to survive a vast bureaucratic maze,
chock full of of regulatory bribe-takers, all working to prove that the chemical entity
in question has at least
some tangential effect on one or more disease conditions
within the human body.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
Only when all of these hurdles are negotiated
can our entity -- which we are now permitted to call a
medicine or a
drug --
receive the imprimatur of official medical science.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
More perverse still, modern pharmacology gives little
thought to the long-term, ill-effects of the drugs to which it gives its approval.
At Alpha Omega Labs we deal with cancer patients the world over, and in the vast majority
of cases the damage created by one or more therapies to which the patient has been subjected
is greater than the original disease for which the patient sought help to begin with. This brings to
mind the observation of the late Neil Postman, namely, that inventors and promoters of
technology "are always given to telling the Public the wonderful things their invention
will
DO -- always neglecting to disclose what their invention will
UNDO." [
5 ]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
The first underlying principle behind the
I Ching, the oldest
and most reverred work of ancient Chinese philosophy, is that "when things reach their extreme,
they revert to their opposite." An American observer might use the pendulum to make the
same observation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
The scientific community, specifically as it manifests
itself in the drug industry, is insanely out of control, reaching
level of absurdity unimageinable in another time and another age. Mander himself used several
examples in his book, even in the 1970's . . . such as a report from the
New England Journal
of Medicine that a team of doctors discovered that infant jaundice could be "cured by ordinary
sunlight. This discovery led to a spurt of articles on the possibility that natural light
might be healthy for humans. What a revelation!" [
6 ]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
Or other "scientific findings" which Mander notes,
which the
New York Times reported in a "six-month period in 1973":
- " A major research institute spending more than $50,000 to discover that the best bait for mice is cheese . . . or
- Another study which found that mother's milk was better balanced nutritionally for infants than commercial
formulas. (That study also proved that mother's milk was better for human infants than cow's milk or goat's milk.)
- A third study . . . that a walk is considerably healthier for the human respiratory and circulatory systems,
in fact for overall health and vitality, than a ride in a car. Bicycling was also found to be beneficial!
- A fourth . . . that juice of fresh oranges has more nutritional value than either canned or frozen
orange juice
- A fifth . . . that infants who are touched a lot frequently grow into adults with greater
self-confidence and have a more integrated relationship with the world than those who are not touched." etc. [ 7 ]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
What is amazing, as Mander notes, is that anyone should have
found it necessary to conduct these studies in the first place. It confirms that "human beings no
longer trust personal observation, even of the self-evident, until it is confirmed by scientific
or technological institutions; human beings have lost insight into natural processes -- how the world works . . . --
because natural processes are now exceedingly difficult to observe."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
And it is in
this environment that modern medicine has been
allowed to evolve into pure, unadultered financial exploitation, for as Mander again notes, "Living within
(these) artificial, reconstructed, arbitrary environments that are strictly the products of human conception,
we have no way to be sure that we know what is true and what is not. We have lost context and
perspective.
What we know is what other humans tell us." [
8 ]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
And this is where the
I Ching comes in.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
All of my adult life I have been studying the many ways in which
Western Civilization is "unsustainable." It is unsustainable because it has lost its natural mooring.
It cannot stay alienated from Nature forever . . . just as the previous 26 major Earth civilizations that
lived and breathed and died over the last 6,000 years. (I cover this extensively in
Chapter 5 of
Meditopia.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e427f/e427f2b0bf7bb89b1a8d3c06371fb83fe18e389e" alt=""
The pharmaceutical paradigm, which brought upon us this
"Great Age of Iatrogenesis," will pass away -- just as will the other components of our civilization
to which it is tethered. And it is in that passing that members of humanity will then again be free
to have a direct, primary experience of their world.